The Questions Posed

                   I have heard
That guilty creatures sitting at a play
Have by the very cunning of the scene
Been struck so to the soul that presently
They have proclaimed their malefactions;
For murder, though it have no tongue, will speak
With most miraculous organ. I'll have these players
Play something like the murder of my father
Before mine uncle. I'll observe his looks,
I'll tent him to the quick. If a but blench,
I know my course. The spirit that I have seen
May be the devil, and the devil hath power
T' assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps,
Out of my weakness and my melancholy_
As he is very potent with such spirits_
Abuses me to damn me. I'll have grounds
More relative than this. The play's the thing
Wherein I'll catch the conscience of the King. (II,ii,569-585)


Fearing that the apparition he saw in Act I may be a demonic deception capitalizing on the mental vulnerability created by his "weakness and ... melancholy," Hamlet devises a trap to test its voracity.  His stated intention in organizing the mousetrap scene is to have more conclusive proof of Claudius' guilt. This test seems to pop into Hamlet's active mind from the moment the players arrive in Act II.  By the end of act, it seems to be fully devised, and Hamlet has already arranged to have a speech inserted in the play for the following night, which, presumably, will play a significant role in activating the king's conscience.  Many of the ingredients essential to this plan as laid out at the end of Act II reappear in Hamlet's instructions to Claudius at the beginning of the play scene itself. The play is intended to parallel the murder of Hamlet's father, one speech is particularly related to the exposure of Claudius' guilt, and Hamlet seems to be using this confrontation to test the nature of the specter.

There is a play tonight before the King.
One scene of it comes near the circumstance
Which I have told thee, of my father's death.
I prithee, when thou seest that act afoot,
Even with the very comment of thy soul
Observe my uncle. If his occulted guilt
Do not itself unkernnel in one speech,
It is a damnèd ghost that we have seen,
And my imaginations are as foul
As vulcan's stithy. (III,ii,70-79)

Anyone staging the play would have to answer for himself of herself the question about how successful this test devised by Hamlet actually proves to be. At the end of the scene, what does he know that might previously have been uncertain?  

O good Horatio, I'll take the ghost's word for a thousand pound. Didst perceive? (III.ii.292)

In particular, does he know that Claudius murdered his father?  Or does he come to believe that Claudius murdered his father?  There is an important difference between knowing and believing, and we might see him as ending the scene in a position where he has come to believe something he still does not know to be true.

Similar questions could be asked with regard to Claudius: Does he come to know that Hamlet knows of his guilt?  Does he simply suspect his guilt? Or does he conclude that Hamlet could not possibly know of his crime?  All of these are possible ways of interpreting the events.  It remains for a director to make choices amongst them and then to stage the scene in such a way that his or her choices are made visible and consistent with the rest of the drama.